Did MoH underestimated serious cardiac complications of mRNA vaccination?

Please share this story - thanks

By Guy Hatchard

An urgent information alert for doctors and medical professionals

On 15 December 2021 Dr. Ashley Bloomfield wrote to DHBs describing the risks of Myocarditis and Pericarditis following vaccination. He estimated that the incidence of cases was 3 per 100,000 vaccinations. We note that this is little different from the expected background rate. Accordingly, Dr. Bloomfield described the risk as ‘serious’ but ‘very rare’.

Dr. Bloomfield described the NZ symptomatology as:

  • Chest heaviness, discomfort, tightness, or pain
  • Difficulty breathing, shortness of breath
  • Feeling dizzy, light-headed or faint 
  • Racing or fluttering heart, or a feeling of ‘skipped beats’

 Dr. Bloomfield said that serious complications can be avoided with timely assessment and treatment. He warned against leaving the condition untreated.

Medsafe publishes an Adverse Events Following Immunisation (AEFI) spreadsheet. We have extracted figures for myocarditis rates current to 22 February 2021. This shows that the actual incidence of myocarditis for under 40 year olds is between 4 to 7 times higher than the expected rate per 100,000 vaccinations. Considerably higher than Dr. Bloomfield hoped.

The latest NZ figures we report above are broadly confirmed by a recent study in Nordic countries and by figures from other countries. We further note that the New England Journal of Medicine in an editorial has raised concerns about the use of boosters among younger (under 40) age groups.

In a parallel development, a report published by Nature has found that incidence of emergency medical call outs for cardiac events is statistically related to Pfizer mRNA vaccination, but not related to Covid infection:

“…the findings raise concerns regarding vaccine-induced undetected severe cardiovascular side-effects and underscore the already established causal relationship between vaccines and myocarditis, a frequent cause of unexpected cardiac arrest in young individuals.”

We want to alert the medical profession to the potential time bomb for NZ healthcare that these two findings together raise. There is a real possibility that subclinical or mild cases of myocarditis following Covid vaccination suggested by the symptomatology above (of which CARM has noted tens of thousands of reports) have in fact been missed or insufficiently treated.

It appears that the initial assessment by the Ministry of Health might have  underestimated the potential for serious cardiac complications of mRNA vaccination, both short term and long term.

Myocarditis has been diagnosed as a problem following 1, 2, and booster doses of the Pfizer mRNA vaccine. Some medical experts in the USA have suggested recently that the routine administration of diagnostic tests in cases of chest pain etc. might be useful in gauging the seriousness and potential long term effects of following mRNA vaccination. We note troponin tests are inexpensive and can rapidly detect cardiac damage.

We are aware of multiple reports of an increased rate of cardiac events in NZ among all age groups, but especially concerning are events for younger people, both male and female. These may be preventable. We are concerned about the lack of availability of up to date centralised data on the current rates of cardiac events in hospital EDs, in the community, and from GPs. At the present time, the public is ill-informed about the levels of risk.

If you are reading this as a medical professional, we suggest that if you are possession of evidence of increased risks or you are concerned or puzzled in any way by increased caseloads or individual cases, it would be sensible and professionally ethical to speak up now, exchange information within your professional circles, and take appropriate precautionary action.

HatchardReport.com suggests that subscribers circulate this to doctors.

The Post-Pandemic Medical State

A few months ago I requested that the local authority remove a couple of trees on their land that were leaning dangerously over our driveway. Today I received an email affirming that they had completed the work. I went down to look at the result and the trees were still standing. They had ticked all the boxes, assessed tree health, taken photographs, written reports, and then axed some trees somewhere, but not mine.

I immediately thought: “This is why you shouldn’t put the government in sole charge of your personal health

This week our government announced that it was extending the success (??) of the pandemic vaccination programme to include multiple other vaccines. It is creating a personal vaccination journal for every person. No thanks, I want to write my own journal and retain my right of informed decision and medical privacy. My father died after being prescribed medication that was contraindicated for his condition. It was a mistake for which no one accepted responsibility and there was no redress.

As long as they follow the rule book supplied by the pharmaceutical industry, doctors will get paid whether their patients get better or not. They will not face discipline even if their patients die as a result.

In fact, medical misadventure is the third leading cause of death. 50% of the population suffer from at least one chronic illness—illness which will never get better despite a lifetime of medication. The pharmaceutical industry makes so much profit, that even when they do lose in court, it’s a flea bite in their cash flow.

If a surgeon cuts off the wrong leg, he will face court proceedings, so why don’t GPs and the drug manufacturers face meaningful consequences if their drug prescriptions cause harm?

The New Zealand Bill of Rights is being ignored

Although New Zealand doesn’t have a written constitution as such, it does have a set of practices and values which are underpinned by statutes and conventions. These include the right of medical choice. Curiously, the medical profession, encouraged by the government, seems to be mostly exempt from these rules. Employers now also have a right to invade your medical privacy and insist that they control what goes in your body.

I’m appealing to ordinary people here to think this through. If someone is doing a job but there are few if any consequences when something goes horribly wrong, is that a good system? I hope you are saying NO. Now what if they are not even obliged to explain themselves or catch up with the latest knowledge in their field? What if compliance is compulsory?

That is precisely the situation we find ourselves in. For the last few weeks I have been highlighting newly published studies in leading journals pointing to serious dangers of mRNA vaccination, but the medical profession is keeping mum. Worse, there is still an unending stream of government advertising urging boosters and advising of their efficacy and safety. Employers are still enforcing mandates with the sanction of the government.

There is a long history here of erosion of ethical standards and safety procedures. Doctors appear to be advising the government to require us to pop the pills and suffer the shots, but they don’t want to be responsible for what happens and they want to get paid, come what may. Your employer now owns certain rights over your body.

The government says it is obliged to ensure that everyone follows medical advice. Obligated by what and by whom? No one seems to know, because there is no law that says that should be the case (quite the reverse actually).

We could call it a case of constitutional overreach, but this would be just a few fancy words covering up what in any other profession would be called a crime.

If a fun fair ride collapses, injuring some children, the owner is responsible. There are no arguments that can be advanced in mitigation. The owner cannot say thousands have ridden safety and these ones were just unlucky. Yet that is precisely the medical excuse.—Thousands have been vaccinated, some have died—unfortunate, but necessary.

How so necessary? We now know mRNA vaccination is not preventing transmission, hospitalisation, or death from Covid. It should be quite clear by now that the protection promised through mRNA vaccination is a faded dream promoted by pharmaceutical companies, hired experts, compliant doctors, and paid media. Certainly no reason to hand over our right of medical choice to the post-pandemic medical state.

The post-pandemic state is manipulative

Yesterday (and most days) we were given a taste of what the post-pandemic medical state looks like. It was revealed the government has been paying Fuse Creative, a brand agency, to promote pandemic policy. As a result, pop stars like Anika Moa and pop culture radio stations like The Edge and many others have been pumping out the good oil. Fuse Creative alone reportedly received $50,000 for one weekend’s work.

Presumably in the near future medical product placement will be normalised.

In the next Zombie Apocalypse movie, expect to see the zombies injected with something labelled mRNA. Miraculously they will be restored, a few unlucky zombies might drop dead, then the hero will tell us that it is the price of freedom.

Today a Guardian article written by Ian Sample (or was it Simple?) used phrases like “the roaring success of Covid vaccines” adjacent to phrases like “the virus remains rampant in the face of mass immunity”. The combination of hyperbole and oxymoron dazzles.

The article went on to say we need a nasal vaccine to complement the mRNA injection. Possibly in some future medical dystopia (which might just be now), the rich will wear aqualungs with vaccine added to their air and the poor will just have to spray it on their fish and chips.

If we swallow this tripe, we only have ourselves to blame. Highly qualified scientists (more and more of them) are sounding the alarm, while the paid media remain stuck in a grove. Doctors are keeping the faith. They are prepared to go down with the ship.

Questions are being ignored

We ordinary citizens should remember it is normal to ask questions and abnormal to refuse to answer. The list of unanswered questions has become very long.

It is extraordinary to listen to the outrage of medical experts, the government, and the media if their pandemic advice is challenged. Puffed up with importance, immunity from prosecution, and lack of accountability, the medical profession has guided the whole country across legal boundaries. Given an inch, they have taken a mile, and now wish for more.

If you have a reaction after eating peanuts, your doctor will tell you to avoid them. If you have a reaction after vaccination, Dr. Ashley Bloomfield will likely require you to have more shots. This is the new post-pandemic medical state, all aboard or you will lose your job. Steel yourself to be pricked and poisoned by someone who has assumed constitutional supremacy, while the government and their loyal opposition nod sagely in approval.

No one is above the law. We do have a Bill of Rights. It should be followed.

Guy Hatchard PhD was formerly a senior manager at Genetic ID a global food safety testing and certification company (now known as FoodChain ID)

Please share this story - thanks